The Commander Series Forum

Hi, we played a brek trought game this night, soviet vs USA 1985, soviet attacking, well, some question arose:

- as soviet I bought a couple of thermobaric assets, that I have scheduled for turn 2 but there are not question about this, the question are:
* AFV are really hitten on 4+? Or on 6 as per arty barrage? If it hits on 4+ thermobaric are crazy strong.
*after expending these 2 assets, I can call with FAOs others thermobaric barrage? If I don't take thermobaric assets, could I call them with FAOs?

- This scenario dictates that the attacker have twice as much point of the defender, as attacker I practically wipe out my friend in 3 turn...we thought that having double points is too much... anyone have the same feeling?

- we cannot understand the meaning of ATGMs, they cost a lot and they aren't decisive... Especially with composite armour tanks.

Many thanks... Maybe I would have other question :]

Meh... The scenarios on BKC II are better in our opinion, they have substituted "twice points" with "50% more", also che defences are improved.

I also re-checked our copy of the damned BKC III, those books were written really better in the rules part, but the scenarios need more adjustments in my opinion

One thing that I never said, we are used to play with 1:1 so 1 tank is 1 tank and 1 infantry stand is a squad.
So, one of the odd matter for us is the survivability of the units... And abrams need six hits to be destroyed.. It's strange for us