Posted on 08 November 2019 at 11:18:07 GMT HI Both, I can't see where the rules say that, except in the special case of the Diversionary Attack scenario (p45 in my edition) so I suspect that is a house/CWC2 rule. In the rulebook, it only excludes off-table artillery units and doesn't mention reserves except as above. I would guess that the real problem here could be that the opponent had more reserves than the rules allow him to have. The rules state "Up to 3 units per full 1000 points of your battlegroup can be placed in your reserve pool". A unit is a platoon/battery and not a formation like a battalion (p5 defines this). If this rule is obeyed, it should be pretty difficult for your opponent to have so much off table you cannot break his force, unless he is holding back lots of high value units like 120mm M1, etc., which would seem pretty daft and possibly 'gamey' in an Encounter battle. Shedman's suggestion is entirely reasonable as a house rule, just pointing out that doesn't seem to be what it says in the rulebook and that there are alternative ways you could play it, like ban reserves in an Encounter, limit reserves to x points per 1000, rather than 3 units per 1000, etc. Every group I play CWC with has house rules, often different ones in the same area, which give the game extra flavour and fun. Cheers, Mark |